Featured image of Polymaker Says Its New HT-PLA Pro Is the Best Filament It’s Ever Made Source: Polymaker
This article is free for you and free from outside influence. To keep things this way, we finance it through advertising, ad-free subscriptions, and shopping links. If you purchase using a shopping link, we may earn a commission. Learn more
Desert Island Picks

Polymaker Says Its New HT-PLA Pro Is the Best Filament It’s Ever Made

Picture ofMatthew Mensley
by Matthew Mensley
Published Jul 23, 2026

The new material boasts impressive fatigue, strength and temperature resistance, says Polymaker, with all of the easy printability of PLA.

Advertisement

Polymaker’s announcement video for its latest filament poses a great thought: Desert Island filaments. You’re stranded on a tropical island with your favorite 3D printer and one pallet of one type of filament. Which filament do you take?

PLA is easiest to print, but can be brittle and will soften when left in the sun. PETG is more weatherproof and tougher, but trickier to keep in printable condition without a dryer. The list goes on, each with their upsides and downsides. Polymaker’s pitch is that HT-PLA Pro has no meaningful trade-offs, in what they think is the ultimate answer for almost all users, desert island or not.

Polymaker HT-PLA Pro is a new PLA-PHB blend that the company describes as “pairing heat stability technology with rugged toughness in one easy-to-print PLA package.” PLA, as we well know, is the most popular and most printed filament, and for good reason – it’s really easy to print. HT-PLA exists to improve the temperature resistance of regular PLA, giving it survivability in warmer environments and use-cases. In the new HT-PLA Pro, Polymaker adds the toughness.

Printing it should be familiar territory – Polymaker states no tuning is required and you can use your regular PLA print settings for HT-PLA Pro, no enclosure or hardened nozzle necessary. Polymaker recommends drying at 60 °C for 6 hours. All standard PLA considerations.

Samples of the new filament were stress tested in a Polymaker-devised thermosiphon impact rig. This tool contains a passive, water-based convection loop at its core, which can gradually soak heat into a 3D printed carriage (with a nested, also printed bumper). A motorized pulley draws the carriage back before slamming it into a steel plate until breaking.

Multiple carriages and bumpers, all printed from various Polymaker materials, underwent the test, which by design exposed each assembly to a variety of possible failure modes – either through heat transferred from the thermosiphon to the carriage, or from the bumper impacting the plate.

In the video, HT-PLA Pro outperformed all other Polymaker PLAs in the thermosiphon impact test, as well as other tougher material classes that you might typically choose because they’re known to be tougher than PLA. In all, the HT-PLA Pro survived more than double the impacts of the company’s specifically tough PLA Pro.

The technical data sheet adds nuance to the story, though, with the new material faring worse than PLA Pro in the notched charpy impact test, for example. So less sudden, heavy-impact resistant, but, as the lengthy video explaining the test concedes, the benefit lies more in a combination of factors that together give everyday durability of a print, rather than specific fringe hits.

One key claim of the material is that it won’t soften and sag in temperatures up to 150 °C right off the build plate – that means high temperature resistance without the need for annealing.

HT-PLA Pro is available now, in 18 colors at $25.99 per 1 kg spool from the Polymaker store. To compare, a spool of HT-PLA currently costs $24.99, while a spool of PLA Pro is $23.99 per 1 kg spool.

Polymaker Material TDS Compared:

Property HT-PLA Pro PLA Pro HT-PLA Polylite PETG Polylite ASA
Young’s modulus (X-Y) 2270±50 MPa 2531.08 ± 25.16 MPa 2945.75±77.35 MPa 2116.8 ± 68.1 MPa 2379 ± 157 MPa
Young’s modulus (Z) 1850±40 MPa 2265.58 ± 48.68 MPa 2596.43±160.44 MPa 1898.7 ± 98.5 MPa 1965 ± 136 MPa
Tensile strength (X-Y) 37.6±1.1 MPa 39.93 ± 0.44 MPa 42.86±0.76 MPa 50.8 ± 0.9 MPa 43.8 ± 0.8 MPa
Tensile strength (Z) 26.8±1.2 MPa 25.39 ± 0.45 MPa 20.83±0.51 MPa 42.8 ± 2.8 MPa 32 ± 1.8 MPa
Elongation at break (X-Y) 13±3 % 16.57 ± 6.18 % 2.80±0.26 % 8.4 ± 1.7 % 6.7 ± 0.6 %
Elongation at break (Z) 2.6±0.7 % 3.05 ± 0.19 % 0.97±0.05 % 3.3 ± 0.2 % 1.65 ± 0.2 %
Bending modulus (X-Y) 2210±140 MPa 2438.41 ± 78.20 MPa 2893.46±53.15 MPa 1898.5 ± 35.5 MPa 3206 ± 108 MPa
Bending modulus (Z) 1910±40 MPa 2368.62 ± 61.58 MPa 2411.22±139.22 MPa N/A N/A
Bending strength (X-Y) 60.1±2.1 MPa 62.12 ± 0.78 MPa 74.04±0.66 MPa 69.6 ± 0.8 MPa 73.4 ± 2.1 MPa
Bending strength (Z) 37.1±1.5 MPa 49.96 ± 1.06 MPa 29.39±1.18 MPa N/A N/A
Notched Charpy impact strength (X-Y) 9.94±1.43 kJ/m² 20.76 ± 2.18 kJ/m² 4.94±0.31 kJ/m² 2.6 ± 0.2 kJ/m² 10.3 ± 0.4 kJ/m²
Notched Charpy impact strength (Z) N/A N/A 4.50±0.11 kJ/m² N/A 6.7 ± 1.4 kJ/m²
Unnotched Charpy impact strength (X-Y) 45.7±7.3 kJ/m² 51.7 ± 4.58 kJ/m² N/A N/A N/A
Unnotched Charpy impact strength (Z) 10.3±2.1 kJ/m² 21.7 ± 2.22 kJ/m² N/A N/A N/A

More Like This:

About the Author:
Matthew Mensley is a senior editor at All3DP with nine years covering consumer 3D printing hardware. He writes news, reviews, and buying guides with the clarity of someone who's seen enough hype cycles to know which ones to take seriously.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement